Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62318
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Civil Engineering
Bansal Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Civil Engineering
Bansal Institute of Engineering and Technology

Department of Civil Engineering
Bansal Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Civil Engineering
Bansal Institute of Engineering and Technology
The impact of silica fume and sand on the surface hardness and workability of M30 grade concrete is investigated in this study. At 1% PCE-based superplasticizer was combined with 0%, 15%, and 20% silica sand and 7% silica fume. The slump test was used to determine workability, while the rebound hammer test was used to determine surface hardness. The results show increased surface hardness with the addition of silica-based materials and improved workability because of the superplasticizer. At 15% silica sand substitution, optimal performance was noted, exhibiting improved surface quality and consistency. The modified concrete is appropriate for real-world construction applications, according to the study's findings.
KEYWORDS
The incorporation of silica sand and 7% silica fume significantly influences the performance of M30 grade concrete [11]. Workability improves from 0% to 15% replacement (70 mm &120 mm slump) due to better particle packing and superplasticizer efficiency [4], [8]. At 20% replacement, workability slightly decreases (100 mm slump) because of increased fines and higher water demand [17]. Rebound hammer values indicate an increase in surface hardness from 34 (0%) to 41 (15%), showing improved density and strength characteristics [13]. At 20%, rebound value drops (~37), suggesting excess silica sand negatively affects compaction and uniformity [1], [8]. The optimum replacement level is 15% silica sand, providing the best balance of workability and strength [20]. Overall, the mix with 15% silica sand + 7% silica fume results in a denser, more durable, and efficient concrete suitable for practical applications [11]. The study confirms that combined use of silica sand and silica fume enhances both fresh and hardened properties of concrete [8]. Silica fume (7%) contributes to microstructure refinement by forming additional C–S–H gel, leading to improved density [11].
[1] M. Malathy, K. Ramesh, and S. Kumar, “Effect of silica sand on concrete properties,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 320, pp. 126–134, 2022. [2] IS 10262:2019, Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. [3] IS 12269:2013, Ordinary Portland Cement, 53 Grade – Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, India. [4] IS 383:2016, Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources, BIS, India. [5] A. M. Neville, Properties of Concrete, 5th ed., Pearson Education, 2011. [6] IS 456:2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, BIS, India. [7] P. K. Mehta and P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw-Hill, 2014. [8] H. A. Amini and M. Farahani, “Synergistic effects of silica sand and silica fume in concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 36, no. 4, 2024. [9] T. C. Powers, “Structure and physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1958. [10] X. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizer on concrete workability,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, pp. 1234–1240, 2019.
Publication Date
5/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...