Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62135
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
BBA Aviation Management
VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)
The aviation industry depends heavily on digital systems to manage reservations, check-in, boarding, and passenger communication. When these systems fail, disruptions can be swift and far-reaching. This study examines how check-in and reservation digital breakdowns affect airline operations and passenger experience. Primary data were collected via a structured survey of 80 respondents comprising frequent, occasional, and infrequent flyers. Secondary data include published case studies of major IT failures at British Airways (2017), Delta Air Lines (2016), Lufthansa (2023), Air India (2023), IndiGo, Amadeus Global Distribution System (2017), and Sabre Corporation (2021). A descriptive quantitative approach was employed; responses were analysed through percentage analysis, ranking analysis, and weighted average methods. Findings indicate that 47.5% of respondents encountered online booking problems, with website or app crashes being the most common issue (50.8%), followed by payment failures (31.7%) and delayed booking confirmations (17.5%). At the airport, 58.8% reported check-in delays caused by system failures; 49.4% described a very negative impact on their travel journey. Airline response satisfaction yielded a weighted average of 2.60 out of 4.0. The study concludes that airlines must urgently invest in robust IT infrastructure, implement effective fail-safes, communicate proactively with passengers, and establish comprehensive recovery plans to strengthen digital reliability.
KEYWORDS
This study provides empirical evidence that airline digital breakdowns in check-in and reservation systems are frequent, consequential, and currently managed inadequately. Nearly half of surveyed passengers encountered online booking failures; a majority experienced check-in delays; and those failures cascaded into actual flight disruptions at a rate of nearly one in five impacted passengers. The human dimension is equally significant. The weighted satisfaction score of 2.60/4.0, with over 40% of respondents neutral or dissatisfied with airline recovery responses, tells a clear story: passengers are not being well-served when digital systems fail. Airlines that manage failure well — through fast communication, trained staff, and transparent compensation — preserve trust. Those that do not lose it permanently. Digital system reliability is a core operational and reputational promise. Investment in robust infrastructure, rigorously tested backup systems, proactive communication, and well-prepared ground staff is an operational necessity — not an optional enhancement — as the industry continues its trajectory toward full digital operation. The systemic concentration risk represented by GDS interdependence warrants specific regulatory attention. When a single third-party platform failure can simultaneously disrupt dozens of global carriers, individual airline resilience frameworks are insufficient. Industry-level standards for GDS redundancy, contingency architecture, and failure notification timelines are overdue.
[1] V. A. Zeithaml et al., "Service quality delivery through web sites," J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 362–375, 2002. [2] M. J. Bitner et al., "The service encounter," J. Mark., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 1990. [3] C. F. Chen and F. S. Chen, "Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction," Tour. Manag., vol. 31, pp. 29–35, 2010. [4] S. Cook, R. Macaulay, and H. Coldicott, Customer Management Excellence. Wiley, 2001. [5] G. C. Saha and T. Theingi, "Service quality in low-cost airline carriers in Thailand," Manag. Serv. Qual., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 350–372, 2009. [6] C. Gronroos, "Service quality: The six criteria," Rev. Bus., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 10–13, 1988. [7] R. Johnston and S. Michel, "Three outcomes of service recovery," Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 79–99, 2008. [8] S. S. Tax and S. W. Brown, "Recovering and learning from service failure," Sloan Manag. Rev., vol. 40, pp. 75–88, 1998. [9] F. F. Reichheld and P. Schefter, "E-loyalty," Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 105–113, 2000. [10] N. O. Ndubisi and T. K. Ling, "Complaint handling and customer loyalty," J. Bus. Econ. Manag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 55–60, 2006.
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...